 |
We are committed to fighting for the rights of plaintiffs through
the civil justice system, combining creativity, experience,
and sound judgment for our clients.
More...
Browse this site, see what is available, give us a call. We provide free case
consultation.
|
 |

 


INDIVIDUALS WE HAVE HELPED:
· Worldwide Water v. Liquid Air, No. CV-03-642-DSF. Result: Judgment for Patent Ownership and Injunction
· Bennett v. Bennett, No. CIV 228770.
Result: Judgment for $610,000.00 house
· Ravins v. City
of Morro Bay, No. CV01-4003.
Result: $2,200,000.00.
· Lazarus
v. Krause, No. BC 283322.
Result: $984,382.00.
· Martin v. Track Mortgage,
No. BC217022. Result: $1,108,000.00.
· Elliott v. Tandy, PC 019397.
Result: $837,814.36.
· Collini v. Black, No. BC
238087. Result: $1,063,835.00.
More... |
 |
RECENT CASES
Worldwide Water v. Liquid Air, No. CV-03-642-DSF;
Result: Judgment for Patent Ownership and Injunction.
"Worldwide Water, aka
Air2Water, owns patents to technology that pulls clean water out of the air and
purifies it for dispensing in homes and offices for less than 15 cents per gallon.
Liquid Air started making these machines in China claiming they had been assigned
the patents to the technology. A patent infringement lawsuit to stop their production
of machines and a business interference lawsuit to recover monetary damages, were
filed against Liquid Air. The business interference lawsuit was settled for a
confidential amount in favor of Worldwide Water and the patent infringement lawsuit
ended in a judgment
that Worldwide Water owns the patents and Liquid Air will no longer produce these
machines."(top)
Bennett v. Bennett, No. CIV 228770.
Result: Judgment for $610,000.00 house.
An 83 year-old woman put her home in the name of her grandson after her husband
had died, with the understanding that the house was still hers. The name
change on the title was only to simplify probate for when she died. The grandmother
had lived in the house for almost thirty years and the house had increased
in value significantly during that time period. Three years after he was
put on title, the grandson sold the grandmother's house, leaving the grandmother
without a place to live. The grandson then used the money from the sale of
the house to buy a new and bigger house for himself and his new wife. A lawsuit
was filed against the grandson for Elder Abuse. Judgment was entered in the
lawsuit awarding the new house to the grandmother. (top)
Ravins v. City of Morro Bay,No. CV01-4003. Result: $2,200,000.00.(top)
A 18 foot skiboat left Morro Bay harbor after being told by city harbor patrol that it was safe to go out of the harbor. Winds and waves picked up and the boat capsized, drowning two young children. Case was referred after the statute of limitation had expired. We converted the case to maritime jurisdiction, which extended the statute of limitations and avoided “Prop 51" and all state recreation and government immunities, and created a right to pre-death pain and suffering. We invited summary judgment to prove our point, which it did. Case then settled for $2,200,000.00.
Lazarus v. Krause, No. BC 283322. Result:
$984,382.00. (top)
Low speed automobile collision, 14 miles per
hour. Neck and low back surgery two years after the accident.
Defense argued that new surgery was needed because of
progressive degeneration following plaintiff’s previous
back surgery five years prior to the collision. Offer
$500,000.00. Demand $800,000.00.
Martin v. Track Mortgage, No. BC217022.
Result: $1,108,000.00. (top)
$1,108,000.00 in compensatory damages with the
punitive damages phase pending. Defendants arranged a
construction loan for $175,000.00 secured by a deed of
trust in third position on plaintiffs’ new home.
Defendants foreclosed and then were foreclosed by the
second deed of trust holder. Plaintiffs claimed improper
foreclosure saying the loan was never fully funded. Defendants
claim to have funded the loan in part with $85,000.00
in cash payments that was denied by plaintiffs. Defendants
also argued no net equity in the home. Offer $5,000.00
and demand $225,000.00.
Elliott v. Tandy, PC 019397. Result:
$837,814.36. (top)
An 82 year old man installs a replacement garage
door opener which overrides the automatic reversing mechanism
of the door. When he tests door by trying to stop it with
his arms, he is thrown to ground and sustains a T12-L1
compression fracture with conservative care. No loss of
earnings. Pre-trial offer was $12,000.00. Trial result
was $762,814.36, plus $75,000 in attorneys fees under
the Consumer Legal Remedies Act.
Collini v. Black, No. BC 238087. Result:
$1,063,835.00. (top)
Legal malpractice case against lawyer who settled a probate
accounting and financial Elder Abuse case against client
for $280,000.00 without disclosing that the claim would
not be dischargeable in bankruptcy. Jury found the accounting
and Elder Abuse cases were fully defensible based on evidence
collected years later. Offer $60,000.00 and demand $400,000.00.
Total damages were $832,000.00 with 69% fault to defendants,
plus attorneys fees of $489,755.00 under Consumer Legal
remedies Act.
Fielding v. Music Center, No. BC 215253.
Result: $580,000.00. (top)
A violist with Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra tripped
on ½" uprising at top of stairs suffering
a small chip fracture of his right shoulder. Pain develops
in the shoulder after plaintiff plays viola for four hours,
so is disqualified from the philharmonic and transferred
to university music department. Summary judgment granted
for defendant, reversed on appeal. Settled for $590,000.00
Skajem v. American Standard Concrete,
No. BC 241735.
Result: $658,716.75. (top)
Owner of concrete company was holding hose pumping concrete
when pump operator moved boom into contact with electrical
lines, sending electricity through plaintiff. After initial
electrical burns resolved, plaintiff continued to complain
of long term fatigue, pain and occasional blackout spells.
Plaintiff continued to receive full pay from company but
argued that he needed to transfer to less physically demanding
work. Defendant argued no signs of injury.
Peck v. Harrah’s Laughlin, No.
BC 195859. Result: $1,225,000.00. (top)
A rigger on a twenty foot tower without a safety harness
grabbed a cable at the top to re-position it in the pulley.
As he touches the cable, he received an electrical shock
and fell to the ground. Low back injury requiring surgical
fusion. Plaintiff could no longer work as a rigger and
instead became an airline pilot. Defendant claimed injuries
were from lack of a harness and not from improper electrical
gear. Settlement.
K.S. v. Hutchison, No. 107636, Result:
$984,553.94. (top)
A dentist sexually abused a female patient while under
nitrous oxide. Defendant company argued consent, exaggeration
and dentist’s conduct was outside the scope of employment.
Trial court ruled that company could only be responsible
for negligence by the dentist and not for any intentional
assault by the dentist. Negligence by closing door and
not using assistant. Company employing dentist was found
100% liable. No MICRA limit. No workers’ compensation
bar for patient who was also an employee. Offer $350,000.00
and demand $500,000.00. Trial and appeals. Read the opinion.
Perez v. Larry Hall Trucking, No. 24
73 44, Result: $6,337,504.00. (top)
Six persons in a small pickup, three in front and three
in the back, returning from Las Vegas at 4:30 in the morning,
drove into the rear of a tractor trailer that was slowly
going down a long hill. One death, two paraplegia, one
compression fractures and one hip dislocation. Defendant
argued driver negligent and fatigued. Plaintiff argued
that the truck was in the wrong lane. Offer was $75,000.00
and demand was $750,000.00. Gross verdict was $11,414,425.00.
Kuhlman v. Phoenix Custom Service, No.
EC 003041.
Result: $4,078,870.00 (top)
Circumstantial evidence was used to show that an unknown
plumber must have cut an angle brace that was holding
up exterior scaffolding that plaintiff had built contrary
to code, causing him to drop 30 feet and suffer ankle
fractures that required surgery and L3-4 and L4-5 low
back compression fractures that required only conservative
care. Plumbers testified and denied any interference with
scaffolding braces. Defense claimed that scaffolding collapsed
because it was weak. Demand $800,000. Offer $300,000.
|
 |